ACM's Democratic Primary Voters' Guide (2007)
This year I feel much better informed about the candidates than I have in the past (with more personal access, rather than reliance on organizational endorsements), and yet I find the choices much harder. In part that's because for many offices the question is both whom to vote for and how many people to vote for in total. I'll try to give you both my picks and my reasoning as I go along. Please, despite the daunting ballot, make the time to vote for City Council and Sheriff, the two places that really offer an opportunity for concrete change this year. But we have recommendations for all portions of the slate as well.
Mayor:
City Council At-Large (5 votes allowed):
See here for the Inquirer's reasoning, and here for Neighborhood Networks' endorsements, among others.
District Council races (vote for 1 in your district):
State Supreme Court (2 votes allowed):
State Superior Court (2 votes allowed):
Court of Common Pleas (4 votes allowed):
Municipal Court (2 votes allowed):
City Commissioner (2 votes allowed):
Sheriff (choose 1):
Register of Wills (choose 1):
Clerk of the Courts (choose 1)
Traffic Court Judge (3 votes allowed):
Ballot questions:
Mayor:
- We recommend Michael Nutter, for all the reasons given here, as well as for the increasing sense that he may be the only man capable of beating Tom Knox, who would be a terrible mayor for this city.
City Council At-Large (5 votes allowed):
- Marc Stier (see here)
- Andy Toy
- Matt Ruben
See here for the Inquirer's reasoning, and here for Neighborhood Networks' endorsements, among others.
District Council races (vote for 1 in your district):
- DiCicco versus Anastasio -- no recommendation (sigh; see here)
- Verna versus Roberts -- Damon Roberts
- (Blackwell unopposed)
- Campbell versus several -- Matt McClure
- Clarke versus several -- Haile Johnston
- (Krajewski unopposed)
- Savage versus Quinones-Sanchez -- Maria Quinones-Sanchez
- Reed Miller versus several -- Irv Ackelsberg
- Tasco versus several -- Marian Tasco
- (O'Neill unopposed [Republican])
State Supreme Court (2 votes allowed):
- C. Darnell Jones
- Debra Todd
State Superior Court (2 votes allowed):
- Anne Lazarus
- Christine Donohue
Court of Common Pleas (4 votes allowed):
- Ellen Green-Ceisler
- Mike Erdos
- Angeles Roca
- Linda Carpenter
- Beverly Muldrow
- Alice Dubow
Municipal Court (2 votes allowed):
- Diane Thompson
- Joyce Eubanks
City Commissioner (2 votes allowed):
- Blair Talmadge
Sheriff (choose 1):
- Michael Untermeyer (see here)
Register of Wills (choose 1):
- Ronald Donatucci (unopposed)
Clerk of the Courts (choose 1)
- Vivian Miller
Traffic Court Judge (3 votes allowed):
- Willie Singletary
- Sandra Mills
- Mike Lowry
Ballot questions:
- We strongly recommend a YES vote on #4,5,6, which are all intended to improve the quality and fairness of city planning.
Labels: endorsements
2 Comments:
Hello, ACM-
First and foremost, I would like to commend you for assembling a remarkably substantive voters' guide for this primary. It's very impressive.
This is my initial visit to your blog, and it is very well-constructed, not only in terms of the factual material and articulated opinions, but in site navigation and design as well.
Second, I publish a web site that you and your readers might be interested in, called www.Campaignia.org.
It is dedicated to the study and understanding of political campaigns. Most recently, I covered the May 7 debate at the National Constitution Center, and I posted a reasonably complete transcript of the post-debate media session with the candidates (I was able to briefly interview all but Fattah) and Chris Matthews. If you're interested, you can find it at
www.campaignia.org/6.html
Third, some observations as we head into the final day-
(I can't vote in this election, and I am not even remotely affiliated with any of the candidates' campaigns, so these are just my own two cents...)
Per your statement, below:
"he [Nutter] may be the only man capable of beating Tom Knox..."
I would agree that it is down to a two-candidate race at this point, just as a matter of observation.
The basic dynamic of the campaign has been Knox vs. anti-Knox, and as long as none of the other four could break loose from the pack, he was assured of victory.
Now that Nutter has emerged, it seems clear that the anti-Knox alliance (a very broad coalition, I should note, of which some members have nothing whatsoever in common other than a mutual interest in defeating him)-
has now coalesced around him. In addition, Nutter's +/- rating was through the roof in the Keystone Poll - 52% +, 11% -, far better than any other candidate - and he was also the leading second choice among voters.
Anyhow, those are some thoughts on Election Eve. Reactions welcome.
Thanks for this! It really helps to make things clearer (even for someone who has looked at the ballot a million times).
Post a Comment
<< Home