Thursday headlines
Mayoral
Other
- Fattah: Can't disclose tax data -- his wife released her confidentiality agreement.
- Knox appeals ruling on Brady -- no surprise there.
Dan at YPP opines that the Brady Ruling is Ridiculous. - Phila. Teachers' Union Refuses to Endorse a Mayoral Candidate This Time
- Mayor's Race: What They're Promising: this installment = Brady housing proposals
- Anti-Brady sentiments:
- Inky Editorial | Brady's other issues
- Cartoonist Auth piles on a harsh visual.
- Inky Editorial | Brady's other issues
Other
- Supreme rebuke for lawyer who took on Pa. high court (basically defense of the judicial pay raise) -- Pennsyltucky Politics has more here: Supreme retribution? (including shock and alarm from all quarters)
- New polls:
- Poll of Pa. voters supports plan to lease turnpike (by a very slim margin)
- Support for tax hike on sales, cigarettes (a little over half)
- Poll of Pa. voters supports plan to lease turnpike (by a very slim margin)
- Citypaper: Could the city finally get to control its own gun laws? -- also an editorial Philadelphia is a city being systematically shot to death.
- DN: PA. EMERGENCIES: BE VERY AFRAID -- lessons from the recent blizzard
- CityPaper: A Secret Plan for Recycling
- Strange political bits:
- Stu Bykofsky | Hoofing it to G'town to nag a pol (again) -- Donna Reed Miller's backyard horse
- CP: Uh-Oh for David Oh? -- he didn't form a formal Committee for his campaign
- Stu Bykofsky | Hoofing it to G'town to nag a pol (again) -- Donna Reed Miller's backyard horse
- Metro: New promise: Computer in every lap
- Phil Goldsmith | In Philly, who's in charge? Don't ask.
- Elections in N.J. to get a bit cleaner - public financing trial run
- New blog in town: Great Expectations: Citizen Voices on Philadelphia's Future (Satullo, Ferric, and other troublemakers)
2 Comments:
I don't think it's really accurate to characterize Dan UA's YPP post on the Brady ruling as "anti-Brady sentiment." Anti-Toole sentiment, indeed, and he's not terribly sympathetic to Brady, but has been clear that he thinks challenging him and/or removing him does not serve the electoral process well.
no, you're completely right. I started the "anti-Brady" list because of the other editorial and the cartoon, and stuck Dan's thing there sort of lamely. I guess I just hate to give X many entries to Brady every day.
I'll move it up with the Knox appeal, since they're both more about the quality of the initial ruling...
Post a Comment
<< Home